Sunday, November 29, 2015

1 Nephi 8:17

17  And it came to pass that I was desirous that Laman and Lemuel should come and partake of the fruit also; wherefore, I cast mine eyes towards the head of the river, that perhaps I might see them.
            -why were Laman and Lemuel not with the other three initially?  What does this signify to us (if anything)?
            -there is a parity of concern, of love, of hope for the future that exists from parents to their children that is unequaled by those outside the family relationship.  Lehi and Sariah love Laman and Lemuel and are as concerned for their future situation/happiness as much as they feel toward Nephi and Sam.  Outsiders, on the other hand, do not have this equality of feeling.  Lets be honest, we like Nephi more than we like Laman.  We would rather be friends with him.  If we had a fun social event we might invite him and not extend an invitation to Lemuel.  To a parent, however, even with the “problem” child, the feelings are just as profound for all.  Lehi deeply wanted Laman and Lemuel to have the same experience as his other children.  This is impulsive and natural.  Hardly a moment passes from seeing his other children that he does not also consider “where are my other boys?”.

 

No comments:

Post a Comment