Monday, May 11, 2015

1 Nephi 2:13

13  Neither did they abelieve that Jerusalem, that great city, could be bdestroyed according to the words of the prophets.  And they were like unto the Jews who were at Jerusalem, who sought to take away the life of my father.
            -Laman and Lemuel were so wrapped up in the temporal viewpoint/orientation of life that they couldn’t see even two weeks past their own noses.  We should be careful about becoming so caught up in worldly affairs, even if they are worthwhile, honorable or genuinely important (like making a living) that we don’t miss the forest for the trees.

            -was Jerusalem, “that great city”, destroyed independent of the beleifs of two of its obscure residents?  Was it destroyed contrary to the beliefs of its most promienet socialites or its most learned scholars or its most powerful military figures?  Yes, it was!  It does not matter the social or intellectual status of pundits, God’s words –however far fetched they may appear to man—have and will always come to pass.  The fact that Laman or Lemuel did not believe in some future condition had no (zero) bearing on reality.

     “neither did they believe”
            -we live in a world of belief.  In the religious world we call this faith.  We are very upfront about possessing faith, that our beliefs and subsequent actions are built on faith.  Make no mistake, all men and all their worldviews (be it science or otherwise) are also based on belief.  There is just as much faith required to believe in science as there is in God even though it is not presented as such.  We think because we can see, touch, feel, measure, hear or intellectually deduce and induce things that those things are absolute, understandable and lasting.  Granted, we know a lot:  science has taught us about the world and we’ve been able to tame and harness it to some extent but so also has religion taught us about morality, law and civility.  Love, not a scientific absolute, is a primary driver of human behavior and relationships.  Beyond a whole host of similar, non-rational emotions, attitudes and beliefs, the most advanced scientists and scientific questions admit that we really don’t know much (consider dark matter, quantum physics, the gaping holes in the evolutionary theory, constant –alpha, etc.).  We live by belief and our belief can be in us or it can be in God.  One is self-proclaimed to be omnipotent, the other has at times claimed himself to be great but the trackrecord of human history suggests otherwise.

    “Jerusalem, that great city”
            -the history of the world is filled with accounts of once great cities that have fallen and become mounds of dirt.  For us, who are more versed in human history, to think that somehow we are different and not subject to similar potentialities –ths is the height of narcicism and arrogance.  Do we not read in the writings of every previously great civilization a claim to their own greatness and their vaunted immunity.  The claim, but we are different has got to be the most tired and pathetic claim spanning the history of mankind.  There is no city, there s no state, there is no people great enough who will not be reduced to the dust heap of history.  This truth is independent of any technology, any political or social system, any denomination of currency or measure of wealth.  The common theme of this temporal world is that all things of this world are temporary.

     “And they were like unto the Jews who were at Jerusalem, who sought to take away the life of my father.”
            -it is unlikely that Laman and Lemuel would have placed themselves in the same company as the Jews who tried to kill Lehi and the other prophets.  It is rare that wickedness and evil is so self-aware.  In fact most of the time the wicked have a tremendous amount of self-delusion even thinking that they are doing good.  Consider Saul of Tarshish.  Self-awarness is nota quality of evil.  In fact the wicked frequently project evil motives on those who oppose their actions.  Others become “close minded”, “oppressive”, “intolerant”, “judemental” and obstructors of their freedom to do and act as they wish.  After all, it is the righteous who promote and abide by moral boundaries and behavioral constraints I(also known as “commandments”).

No comments:

Post a Comment